Tyme Lyne \v/ .†.Depth.Defined.†.

[Tyme Lyne]

I guess that's 1-0 his way ...uppin!....lol the other two aint vote lik talking about it...lol

[.†.Depth.Defined.†.]

Uppin' 4 votes!

[G.A]

Originally Posted by Tyme Lyne

I guess that's 1-0 his way ...uppin!....lol the other two aint vote lik talking about it...lol

that's clearly 2-0
don't get butthurt.

[Tyme Lyne]

LOOK MUTHA FUCKA! U BEEN TALKING A LOT OF SHYT IN THE THREADS LATELY......U WANNA BATTLE THIS SHYT OUT ? G..A...?....damn...STFU!.....lol

[Tyme Lyne]

butthurt?....nigga imma female ! homo...the only ass that's gonna get hurt ...after im done puttin my foot up in that shyt....easy!...

soundin like miles militis protégé or something ...get the fuck outta here hater....

[.†.Depth.Defined.†.]

Oh yea he is right I must have skipped over a vote or somethin'.

[Tyme Lyne]

....damn I knew I won't the only person who thought it was 1-0....ol **** bytch ass voted....

2-0 uppin for more votes....mutha fuckas!

[The Coldest]

i think depth got it. her stuff was kinda basic and played before, but i really didnt understand tyme's lines... get it... ha anywho yeah it seemed you forced the dictionary ma...

[Tyme Lyne]

oh well ..cage history...bout time this damn...battle ended...lol..

ill holla..

[MalvernDigga]

Breakdown as follows

Tyme Line - the alliteration was a cool attempt, but you don't have to make EVERYWORD a 'd.' Honestly it throws the flow off bad. You can go for every other word or shit like that, but going word for word just throws it off; well actually it kills the flow. Its nice that you took an angle to the battle, that's a bit creative; but I agree, it seems like you just opened up the dictionary and tried to put words together and opened the thesaurus as well. Some of that didn't make a whole lot of sense, and when you have to look up word for word what each word is 'supposed' to say, your losing what your trying to accomplish, a hard hitting punch. Honestly the punches felt non-existent and you really had to look for them. It got to the point where you actually forgot who you were addressing because of the numerous amounts of 'd.' As I said its a cool attempt but you over-did it. Even attempted wordplay/nameplay failed and its near impossible to point out a metaphor cause you weren't able to be clear about it. Obviously with this, the wording is off as well, because you're relying on words of only the 'd' origin. Sub-par drop, with a nice attempted twist, but failed.

Depth Defined - Are you .Crossed. from AFR and DP? If not whatever, but just the 'crosses' and the style of your posts make me think it is. Regardless off to the vote, it was an 'ok' drop. Mostly based off nameplay that's probably been done in some aspect before. The punches were ok, worded somewhat cleverly. The set-ups need a bit of work though. Your transition relies too heavily upon 'so' and 'but' to try to make the set-ups relate. You can do that, but it gets mad played out after a while and kills the wording. Also makes it seem as if your trying to connect two completely oblivious concepts so that it appears as though your set-up works. It does technically work, but its redundant to use the same start off to a punchline over and over again. I liked the first bar, I think that was possibly your most creative attempt on nameplay and the punch was pretty solid. The 2nd bar was by far the worst, as well. It just seemed like a really rushed attempt and it almost seemed too short. Not enough meat in it. Flow isn't the end-all be all in text, but it is important nonetheless to a degree and DD had a much better flow throughout his flow. At least his flowed, and his bars were short and concise; which means better wording as well.

V/ Depth Defined - sub-stellar with nothing really outstanding. A creative approach that failed, and just more or less a normal approach with its ups and down. Mind you, it was only 3 bars as well, so that's not the greatest representation either.

I know the battle's over, but I had to put my 2 cents in...