Nissan GT-R vs. Ford GT Video

[Grahf16]

Originally Posted by mycrownvic02

Are you smoking crack? You must have the mustang gt mixed up wih the ford gt. The ford gt will kill a c6 vette, and it also beats the z06. The gt is more of a top end car, Ide like to see the gtr race it 0-190. No doubt the gt will run off and leave it badly.. Here is a link of some 0-185 times.

http://www.dtmpower.co.za/forums/showthread.php?t=563

Incase you were not able to read this correctly.

33,6sec - Ford GT 550 hp

57,9sec - Corvette Z06 512 hp

The ford gt beat the z06 by more than 24 seconds. This just further shows the stupidity of your post claiming the gt cant beat a regular vett.. The shelby gt500 goes head up to the c6 vett. The zr1 is going to be the only vehicle comparible to the ford gt that chevy makes. period

Well, according to your link the R32 GT-R beats out all of them

The Z06 is shorter, skinnier, and weighs less than the Ford GT, has a bigger engine with all motor vs. supercharged.

If you really think the GT beats out the Z06 by 24 seconds, then you seriously are a fucking retard. The Z06 could reach 0-100 a second faster than the Ford GT, and with the nature of Superchargers, you will definitely have to stay in the high revs to even be effective whereas the Z06 will constantly have power on demand. Even considering the laptimes at Nurburgring, 24 second difference from 0-180 is highly debatable.

And then factor in the GT-R destroying the nurburgring track at 7:29 (nearly 12 seconds faster than both the Z06 and the Ford GT), and you pretty much need to take that mag racing shit elsewhere.

[rs2000mk2]

teh H0ndaz w0uld paWnzzzZZZ

[rosh666]

gt-r is crazy fast...

[mycrownvic02]

Originally Posted by Grahf16

Well, according to your link the R32 GT-R beats out all of them

The Z06 is shorter, skinnier, and weighs less than the Ford GT, has a bigger engine with all motor vs. supercharged.

If you really think the GT beats out the Z06 by 24 seconds, then you seriously are a fucking retard. The Z06 could reach 0-100 a second faster than the Ford GT, and with the nature of Superchargers, you will definitely have to stay in the high revs to even be effective whereas the Z06 will constantly have power on demand. Even considering the laptimes at Nurburgring, 24 second difference from 0-180 is highly debatable.

And then factor in the GT-R destroying the nurburgring track at 7:29 (nearly 12 seconds faster than both the Z06 and the Ford GT), and you pretty much need to take that mag racing shit elsewhere.

That time posted with the gtr was an old skyline racecar with over 1000hp! You made claims about the ford gt not being able to keep up with the regular c6 vette, which just shows pure stupidity, and since when does the chevy having a bigger motor have to do with it being faster than a ford gt? The ford has more horsepower, a much better engine/ tranny/ body/ everything! Watch some top gear, the ford beats the z06 easily on the track. Besides the chevy having a large motor, you get nothing else that is comparible with the gt. You get a chevy malibo steering wheel, and half ass interior aswell. The ford gt, and the z06 are not comparible cars period.. I have nothing against chevy, but the 2 dont compare period. As for the gtr, it looks like a kids play car. Ide take the ford or the vett over it any day of the week.

[Organika]

Originally Posted by rs2000mk2

teh H0ndaz w0uld paWnzzzZZZ

That upcoming NSX will.

[mycrownvic02]

Originally Posted by Grahf16

Well, according to your link the R32 GT-R beats out all of them

The Z06 is shorter, skinnier, and weighs less than the Ford GT, has a bigger engine with all motor vs. supercharged.

If you really think the GT beats out the Z06 by 24 seconds, then you seriously are a fucking retard. The Z06 could reach 0-100 a second faster than the Ford GT, and with the nature of Superchargers, you will definitely have to stay in the high revs to even be effective whereas the Z06 will constantly have power on demand. Even considering the laptimes at Nurburgring, 24 second difference from 0-180 is highly debatable.

And then factor in the GT-R destroying the nurburgring track at 7:29 (nearly 12 seconds faster than both the Z06 and the Ford GT), and you pretty much need to take that mag racing shit elsewhere.

By the way, the time for the ford gt doing 142 doesnt appear to be official, it seems to be estimated. I have serious doubts about it beating the gt by 12 seconds considering all the specs of both cars, weight, and ect.. The privious gtr times were way slower, then all of a sudden a 7.29.. Doesnt add up..

[Alak]

^ that's because they redid the surface of the Nurburgring and the weather conditions were "perfect". Not to mention Suzuki driving a U.S./Euro-spec GT-R that differs in suspension with the Japanese-spec models. Video proof:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smxFKOlF_tk

As for the GT vs. Z06 discussion, Wikipedia states that the Ford GT beat the Corvette by 0.9 seconds on the N'Ring...if you want to throw that in for argument's sake.

Btw, the Corvette ZR1 recently posted a lap time of 7:26 which beats the base GT-R and the Zonda F's lap times. There's no video, but as of now I think it's the fastest production car in the world.

[mycrownvic02]

Which even brings up more of an argument that the ford gt is more than likely capable of a better time, not knowing the weather conditions, and also it did the track in what like 2006? As for the zr1, thats an impressive time, but I still have alot of doubts about several of the times. For instance the buggati veyron's time was absolutely horrible, which should easily kill the zr1's time. Im guesing it was subpar drivers, or bad weather. Their is no reason the veyron shouldnt be the fastest production car on that track. Im starting to think these times on the track are pretty worthless.. As for the nissan toy car again, it appears that car and driver are having several problems with them. Saying they are very inconsistent. Apparently they are getting wildly different results from each gtr..

[Grahf16]

Originally Posted by mycrownvic02

Which even brings up more of an argument that the ford gt is more than likely capable of a better time, not knowing the weather conditions, and also it did the track in what like 2006? As for the zr1, thats an impressive time, but I still have alot of doubts about several of the times. For instance the buggati veyron's time was absolutely horrible, which should easily kill the zr1's time. Im guesing it was subpar drivers, or bad weather. Their is no reason the veyron shouldnt be the fastest production car on that track. Im starting to think these times on the track are pretty worthless.. As for the nissan toy car again, it appears that car and driver are having several problems with them. Saying they are very inconsistent. Apparently they are getting wildly different results from each gtr..

HP, or Top Speed does not determine which is ultimately a better car. Just because the Veyron could go REAL fast in a straightline does not mean that it will best other cars on the track due to brute strength.

[rs2000mk2]

power to weight ratio >>>>>>